Building Inclusion When Companies Back Down

Building Inclusion When Companies Back Down

Transform corporate DEI retreat into opportunity for deeper, more resilient inclusive cultures through individual leadership and anti-fragile practices.

  • 7 minute read
  • Culture
Five weathered figures connected in solidarity, representing resilient inclusion that strengthens through connection

Following US executive orders in January 2025 targeting federal DEI programmes, corporate America began a rapid retreat from diversity commitments. Research by Winston's Capital Markets & Securities Law Watch shows that 68 of 74 publicly reviewable Fortune 100 companies have scaled back their DEI disclosures in proxy statements. Some moved diversity metrics to grayscale, others eliminated them entirely.

The shift extends beyond regulatory compliance. What initially appeared as cautious legal positioning has revealed itself as something more troubling. These same companies celebrated inclusion as core values just months ago, yet fundamental corporate retreat from those commitments exposes how shallow they actually were.

Meanwhile, The Telegraph reports that UK headhunters are witnessing the return of all-male shortlists to City businesses. Companies that spent years requiring diverse candidate pools are quietly abandoning those requirements. As one FTSE 100 executive told the newspaper: "Companies shouldn't be afraid of having all-female or all-male shortlists."

As a leader who believes in inclusive environments, you face a choice. Wait for corporate courage to return, or build inclusion that doesn't depend on company policy, proxy statements, or executive mandate. The current retreat reveals which inclusion efforts were performative and which were foundational.

When Corporate Courage Becomes Conditional

The scale of corporate backtracking is staggering. Amazon announced it is "winding down outdated programs and materials" related to DEI whilst removing references to "inclusion and diversity" from its annual report. Meta terminated its DEI team entirely. McDonald's ceased representation goals and renamed its diversity team the "Global Inclusion Team."

Ford eliminated DEI language from its annual report. Walmart announced it will phase out the term "diversity, equity and inclusion" altogether. Target concluded its three-year DEI goals and stopped external diversity surveys. Google scrapped DEI hiring goals that aimed for 30% leadership representation from underrepresented groups by 2025.

The pattern extends beyond US companies responding to American federal policy changes. UK firms are joining the retreat. Raconteur reports that BT stopped using DEI metrics for manager bonuses, PwC dropped diversity goals and wound down scholarship programmes aimed at improving diversity, and Goldman Sachs scrapped its requirement for companies to have diverse board members before IPO advice.

This isn't about politics. It's about corporate integrity. Companies that spent years proclaiming diversity as "core values" and "business imperative" are now quietly erasing those commitments when defending them requires actual courage.

Consider the difference between companies maintaining their inclusion efforts and those abandoning them. The Progressive Corporation continues presenting director diversity statistics and criticising DEI rollbacks. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell stated: "We got into diversity efforts because we felt it was the right thing for the National Football League, and we're going to continue to do those efforts. We're not in this because it's a trend."

Compare this to companies eliminating diversity matrices, removing DEI website sections, and instructing employees to remove pronouns from email signatures. The contrast is stark and damning. It reveals which organisations embedded inclusion in their values versus which treated it as compliance theatre that could be abandoned the moment it became inconvenient.

Building Anti-Fragile Inclusion Cultures

Resilient inclusion survives challenges. Anti-fragile inclusion grows stronger under pressure. The current backlash provides a perfect stress test, revealing which inclusive practices depend on institutional support and which operate independently.

Teams with deeply embedded inclusion practices are weathering current changes because their culture was operational, not programmatic. They built inclusion through daily leadership behaviour, hiring practices focused on reducing bias, performance reviews that addressed systemic inequities, and team dynamics that created genuine psychological safety.

I worked with a team that built inclusion through daily practices rather than formal programmes. When their company's DEI initiatives disappeared, the team's inclusive culture remained because it lived in how they made decisions, solved problems, and supported each other's growth. The retreat revealed that their inclusion was foundational rather than cosmetic.

Moving inclusion from HR initiatives to leadership behaviour creates sustainability that transcends policy changes. This means hiring practices that actively counter unconscious bias, meeting facilitation that ensures all voices contribute, decision-making processes that seek diverse perspectives, and performance feedback that addresses both results and behaviours.

The most sustainable inclusion practices integrate with business operations rather than existing alongside them. When bias reduction improves decision quality, diverse hiring strengthens team capability, and inclusive communication enhances collaboration, inclusion becomes business advantage rather than compliance burden.

The Male Ally Opportunity Hidden in Crisis

Male allies face a defining test when institutional support evaporates. The current environment ruthlessly separates committed allies from fair-weather participants. Those who built authentic relationships and developed genuine understanding of systemic challenges continue their work regardless of corporate messaging. Those who were just going through the motions have conveniently disappeared.

Using privileged positions to maintain inclusion momentum becomes essential when formal programmes disappear. This means continuing mentorship and sponsorship relationships, creating opportunities for underrepresented colleagues, speaking up against bias and exclusionary behaviour, and building coalition support through individual relationship building.

The "regardless strategy" provides a framework for sustainable allyship with inclusion practices that work regardless of corporate policy, political climate, or executive messaging. These include treating all team members with equal respect and development focus, making decisions based on merit whilst actively countering systemic biases, creating environments where everyone can contribute their best work, and addressing discrimination when witnessed.

Individual leaders often have more power than they realise when corporate support disappears. Team environments reflect leadership behaviour more than corporate policy. Managers who consistently demonstrate inclusive practices create cultures that operate independently of organisational mandates.

The current moment offers male allies particular opportunity and responsibility. When companies retreat from visible inclusion commitments, individual leaders can demonstrate what authentic commitment actually looks like. This is where real leadership emerges, not in boardroom presentations but in daily choices about how to treat people and build teams.

Practical Framework for Crisis-Proof Inclusion

Behavioural Integration embeds inclusion in daily leadership practices. This includes facilitating meetings that engage all participants, providing feedback that addresses both performance and growth opportunities equally, making hiring decisions that actively counter unconscious bias, and creating team norms that support psychological safety and contribution.

Relationship Infrastructure builds authentic professional connections that transcend formal programmes. Mentoring and sponsorship relationships based on genuine development rather than demographic matching create sustained support systems. Cross-demographic professional networks provide insights and opportunities that benefit everyone involved.

Cultural Influence involves modelling inclusive leadership regardless of corporate messaging. This means creating environments where people feel safe bringing their full selves to work, addressing bias and exclusionary behaviour when encountered, and building team cultures that leverage diverse perspectives for better outcomes.

When traditional DEI metrics disappear, focus on team psychological safety indicators, retention and advancement patterns across demographics, quality of cross-demographic professional relationships, and innovation outcomes in diverse teams. These measures reveal cultural health independent of formal programme participation.

The Inclusion That Endures

Corporate retreat from DEI commitments has done us a favour by revealing which practices were genuine and which were performative window dressing. This brutal clarity enables building something stronger. Inclusion that survives because it's embedded in how you lead, not what policies permit.

The most effective inclusion work often happens through individual leadership rather than institutional mandate. When managers create environments where everyone can contribute their best work, when hiring decisions actively counter systemic bias, and when team cultures leverage diverse perspectives for better outcomes, inclusion becomes operational rather than aspirational.

As male allies and inclusive leaders, we have more power than we realise when we stop waiting for corporate permission. The current moment demands individual courage to maintain inclusion momentum when institutions fail us. This isn't about replacing systemic change with individual action. It's about building foundations strong enough to survive corporate cowardice and political winds.

The real work begins now, build inclusion that survives because it creates genuine value and not because policies require it. This moment separates leaders who need permission from those who take responsibility. Choose accordingly.